Are MRNA injection mandates a violation of the Nuremberg Code ?
Pt. 1 - Are They Experimental ? NurembUrger With Cheese ?
First of all, I am not a lawyer, so no legal advice is given or inferred ! Also, it’s my opinion that using this, “violation of The Nuremberg Code” premise as an argument in an actual court case, at least within American Jurisprudence , is likely NOT to be a winning argument due to a number of factors I could address in the comments if asked.
I am addressing this as it seems to be a prevalent debate on social media, so the issue first to resolve is whether or not the Emergency Use Authorized (Not FDA approved) MRNA medical products and J&J jabs are considered to be experimental by the official (don’t laugh) sources, since the primary thrust of The N-Code is medical experimentation.
To prove that these products are legally considered to be experimental, the assembly of the following sources will demonstrate this premise.
1. 21 U.S. Code § 360bbb(e) ,
2. 21 U.S. Code § 360bbb-0a(a)(2) , and
3. The FDA pub, "Understanding Investigational Drugs" (archived link in the event of an “update” of “The Science™”),
1. 21 U.S. Code § 360bbb(e) is the source of what determines an Emergency Use Authorized (EUA) “investigational drug” under the authroity of the FDA. Since the current J&J , and MRNA Pfizer/Moderna products are EUA, they fall under the authority of this code.
2. 21 U.S. Code § 360bbb-0a(a)(2) states that these “eligible investigational drugs” are defined as investigational drugs as referred to in section 360bbb above.
3. The FDA pub, "Understanding Investigational Drugs" states, “An investigational drug can also be called an experimental drug”.
Since
21 U.S. Code § 360bbb represents the authority for EUA medical products, and
21 U.S. Code § 360bbb-0a(a)(2) defines what “eligible investigational drugs” are under the authority of 21 U.S. Code § 360bbb, and
The FDA in it’s own publication, "Understanding Investigational Drugs” states , “An investigational drug can also be called an experimental drug”, then
It doesn’t take a high powered , penthouse of the skyscraper attorney, or Nobel Peace Prize candidate vaccine scientist to determine that the J&J, and EUA Pfizer/Moderna MRNA products are defined as experimental by the FDA.
Now that there is no question that any EUA medical product is experimental as defined and admitted to by the FDA, there are other peripheral issues which I believe supplement the “experimental” premise even further:
In the entire history of vaccines till 2020, vaccines took 10 years with three phases of study for both efficacy and safety.
The control/placebo group for studying efficacy and safety has now been completely eliminated, and
A May 2020 journal reported that certain KEY animal studies were skipped altogether,
“Still, the result is “a concern” that raises the possibility that vaccinated people could still spread the virus, says Douglas Reed, an aerobiologist at the University of Pittsburgh Center for Vaccine Research in Pennsylvania. “Ideally, you want a vaccine that would protect against disease and against transmission, so that we can kind of break the chain,” he says. One way to find out whether vaccines can prevent transmission would be to study them in animals that are naturally susceptible to the virus and seem capable of spreading it, such as ferrets and hamsters, says Reed. He and other researchers also point out that macaques display only mild symptoms of coronavirus infection, and they wonder whether vaccines should be trialled in animals that develop more severe disease.”
What we are seeing is that Even a casual observer ought to have these questions ,
“How the entire history of vaccines in the U.S. demonstrates that "standard" vaccines prior to 2020 took years to test, but now unprecedented technologies do not require such rigorous standards ?” , and
“What kind of serious trial to determine safety and efficacy would eliminate a control group prior to phase 3 ?” , and
Why would an unprecedented or even conventional bio-technology, skip key animal trials ?
Even in May of 2020, it was known that the animal trial skipped was the trial to determine whether the vaccine could prevent transmission. There are now probably thousands of articles demonstrating “breakthrough” (vaccine failure) infections from those vaccinated, amounting to what are considered to be “leaky” vaccines.
So not only are these EUA medical products experimental, the actual processes of long term safety/efficacy trial, elimination of a control group, and key animal trials skipped all have flown in the face of over a centuries’ worth of conventional wisdom for vaccine development , so while not entirely, “experimental”, the term “unprecedented processes” could fairly describe such.
Part 2. will likely deal with the “informed consent” aspect as time allows
I am thankfully in the control group...